By Daniel Kolak, Visit Amazon's John Symons Page, search results, Learn about Author Central, John Symons,
Jaakko Hintikka is among the such a lot artistic figures in modern philosophy. He has made major contributions to nearly all parts of the self-discipline, from epistemology and the philosophy of good judgment to the heritage of philosophy and the philosophy of technological know-how. a part of the fruitfulness of Hintikka’s paintings is because of its commencing vital new strains of research and new techniques to conventional philosophical difficulties. This quantity gathers jointly essays from a few of Hintikka’s colleagues and previous scholars exploring his impression on their paintings and pursuing a number of the insights that we have got present in his paintings. This publication incorporates a complete evaluate of Hintikka’s philosophy via Dan Kolak and John Symons and an annotated bibliography of Hintikka’s paintings.
Read Online or Download Quantifiers, Questions and Quantum Physics: Essays on the Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka PDF
Best logic & language books
During this hugely soaking up paintings, Balaguer demonstrates that no stable arguments exist both for or opposed to mathematical platonism-for instance, the view that summary mathematical items do exist and that mathematical theories are descriptions of such gadgets. Balaguer does this by means of developing that either platonism and anti-platonism are justifiable perspectives.
What's language? How does it relate to the area? How does it relate to the brain? may still our view of language impact our view of the realm? those are one of the valuable concerns lined during this lively and strangely transparent creation to the philosophy of language. Making no pretense of neutrality, Michael Devitt and Kim Sterelny take a distinct theoretical stance.
Within the overdue Nineteen Nineties, AI witnessed an expanding use of the time period 'argumentation' inside its bounds: in common language processing, in person interface layout, in good judgment programming and nonmonotonic reasoning, in Al's interface with the criminal neighborhood, and within the newly rising box of multi-agent structures.
Within the final decade, the everyday challenge of the regress of purposes has lower back to popular attention in epistemology. And with the go back of the matter, overview of the choices on hand for its answer is all started anew. Reason’s regress challenge, approximately placed, is if one has reliable purposes to think anything, one should have stable cause to carry these purposes are strong.
Additional info for Quantifiers, Questions and Quantum Physics: Essays on the Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka
If the same kind of situation holds in the case of theories of metaphysical modality and their relation to theories of identity, then Kripke is right; there is no real problem of transworld identity. The only problem is he is not right. What particular theory of identity one affirms makes an important difference in determining what theory of metaphysical necessity is correct, even when we put the same kind of constraints on theories of identity. But before we argue for the transcendental nature of the problem of transworld identity, we must restrict our domain of discourse.
While Lewis may consider a universal third person logic rather weak there is nothing in the way of arguing for a much stronger first person logic. This is in stark contrast to the counterfactual proposal of the previous section in which the first person logic was quite weak. On the modal epistemological account all of (1)–(4) may be valid in uniform contexts for a first person knowledge operator. 6. ‘ELUSIVE’ LOGICAL EPISTEMOLOGY There is a feature of Hintikka’s logical epistemology which may make it become as ‘elusive’ as any careless mainstream theory of knowledge.
But that’s the problem; certainly this person will differ from Quine in at least one respect: he will not be a philosopher. So we cannot identify them by a mere coincidence of properties. Hence the question arises: How do we identify individuals across possible worlds? If there is no way of identifying individuals across possible worlds, how can statements of possibility or necessity specifically concerned with individuals make sense? Hintikka on the Problem with the Problem of Transworld Identity 2.