By Ian Hacking

Certainly one of Ian Hacking's earliest courses, this ebook showcases his early rules at the important thoughts and questions surrounding statistical reasoning. He explores the fundamental ideas of statistical reasoning and exams them, either at a philosophical point and by way of their functional outcomes for statisticians. provided in a clean twenty-first-century sequence livery, and together with a particularly commissioned preface written via Jan-Willem Romeijn, illuminating its enduring value and relevance to philosophical enquiry, Hacking's influential and unique paintings has been revived for a brand new new release of readers.

Show description

Read or Download Logic of Statistical Inference PDF

Best logic & language books

Platonism and anti-Platonism in mathematics

During this hugely soaking up paintings, Balaguer demonstrates that no solid arguments exist both for or opposed to mathematical platonism-for instance, the view that summary mathematical items do exist and that mathematical theories are descriptions of such gadgets. Balaguer does this by means of constructing that either platonism and anti-platonism are justifiable perspectives.

Language and Reality: Introduction to the Philosophy of Language

What's language? How does it relate to the area? How does it relate to the brain? should still our view of language impact our view of the realm? those are one of the important matters lined during this lively and strangely transparent creation to the philosophy of language. Making no pretense of neutrality, Michael Devitt and Kim Sterelny take a distinct theoretical stance.

Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation

Within the overdue Nineteen Nineties, AI witnessed an expanding use of the time period 'argumentation' inside of its bounds: in average language processing, in person interface layout, in good judgment programming and nonmonotonic reasoning, in Al's interface with the felony group, and within the newly rising box of multi-agent structures.

Epistemology and the Regress Problem

Within the final decade, the ordinary challenge of the regress of purposes has back to trendy attention in epistemology. And with the go back of the matter, overview of the choices on hand for its answer is all started anew. Reason’s regress challenge, approximately positioned, is if one has sturdy purposes to think whatever, one should have strong cause to carry these purposes are stable.

Extra info for Logic of Statistical Inference

Sample text

2) Conjunction. If e implies i, then h/e  h & i/e. (3) Transitivity. If h/e  i/d and i/d  j/c, then h/e  j/c. (4) Identity, h/e  i/i. Typical consequences of these theses are: h=e  h=e: If e implies h and d implies i, and j & h/e  k & i/d, then j/e  k/d. Comparative and absolute support It is very important to distinguish the comparative logic of support from the far stronger logic of ‘absolute’ quantitative support. In that logic it is supposed that there are quantitative measures of the degree to which an hypothesis h is supported by evidence e.

Finally I may return to particulars. Statistics, being a relatively specialized science, much more specialized than arithmetic, does call for an extensive underlying logic. We shall take any standard logic currently effective for mathematics, and to this add Koopman’s logic of support. The resulting underlying logic will be called, for short, Koopman’s logic; we simply take for granted what is standard everywhere in mathematics. To our underlying logic we shall add postulates about chance. Three have been added already, in the form of Kolmogoroff’s axioms.

It might be urged that in a given state of information, there is but one reasonable guess. It is of no significance, the argument would continue, how many guesses are to be made. If reasonable and a million guesses to follow, then reasonable. In particular, reasonable if none to follow. Tempting though it is, this argument is wrong. Guess of ‘black’ every time, in accord with the long run rule, is held reasonable because, in a certain sense, there is a guaranteed upper bound to error. This bound is less than that for any rival rule.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.12 of 5 – based on 14 votes